By A Correspondent
In a bold statement on Wednesday, January 15, 2025, Killer Zivhu, a prominent Zanu PF figure and former MP for Chivi South, expressed strong opposition to the proposed constitutional amendment aimed at allowing President Emmerson Mnangagwa to remain in office until 2030, beyond the current constitutional limit of 2028.
Zivhu emphasized that such changes were unnecessary and could have far-reaching negative consequences for the nation.
“Reckless constitutional amendments can have devastating effects! Let’s prioritize logic over emotions to prevent job losses, company closures & social unrest,” Zivhu warned during an impassioned speech. “Our constitution is our future.
Let’s do it right!” His comments reflect concerns over the potential for instability and the long-term repercussions of hastily enacted changes, especially with regards to the extension of presidential terms.
Zivhu’s remarks come amid growing debate over the proposed amendment, which seeks to extend President Mnangagwa’s term by an additional two years, allowing him to stay in office until 2030.
The current constitution stipulates that Mnangagwa’s second term ends in 2028, after which he would no longer be eligible for re-election under the two-term limit.
“Zimbabwe has a complex history of constitutional reform,” Zivhu noted, reflecting on the nation’s past efforts.
“The 2000 referendum was rejected, and the 2013 constitution was designed to promote democracy and stability.
Why are we now pushing for another amendment, particularly one that extends the presidency? Saka mava kuda imwe yeyi futi?” he added, questioning the logic behind attempting to amend the constitution to favor the ruling party’s agenda.
Zivhu’s comments have sparked wider discussion regarding the direction of constitutional reform in Zimbabwe and the potential consequences of altering the nation’s legal framework once again.
Critics argue that such changes should be approached cautiously to avoid undermining the integrity of the constitution, while proponents believe that amendments are necessary to address evolving political and economic realities.
As the debate intensifies, Zimbabweans are left to weigh the risks and benefits of further constitutional changes, particularly in relation to the extension of presidential terms.