Veteran farmer and SADC Tribunal Watch head Ben Freeth writes blasting the Morgan Tsvangirai led MDC-T for neglect of duty on the New Constitution.
OPEN LETTER TO EDDIE CROSS, POLICY CO-ORDINATOR GENERAL FOR THE MDC
Dear Eddie
Your article: The Battle of the Titans – 28 November 2014
I remain distressed at your apparent blindness to the repugnant Section 72 of our “modern” and “brave new” Constitution, as you’ve referred to it previously. In your latest piece entitled “Battle of the Titans”, you write:
“Now we have adopted a new Constitution – the first crafted by Zimbabweans. It is a modern Constitution which entrenches all the values and norms that have been so damaged by the conflicts in our society since 1980.”
As you know I have been extremely vocal regarding Section 72 of the new Constitution. I believe implicitly that individual private property rights are fundamental to a functioning modern society. A country in which the State can take private property at the stroke of a pen and where individuals are expressly barred by the Constitution from getting any recourse is a backward country with a backward Constitution. Such a Constitution, contrary to what you say, goes against all “values and norms” of “modern constitutions” around the world.
As you are aware, we fought a successful legal battle in the SADC Tribunal to get this exact section – then Amendment Number 17 of the old Constitution – struck down. This very section then reappeared in the new Constitution – and it seems as if you are not prepared to acknowledge it, either in your recent speech to the jurists in Cape Town or, after I pointed it out to you, even now.
The battle to get Amendment 17 struck down ultimately cost a great deal – the life of my father-in-law, Mike Campbell, being the most significant cost to us. For you to gloss over the reincarnated Amendment 17 as Section 72, is a very sad indictment of where you, and your part of the so-called democratic movement, are at.
Proper Constitutional democracy does not allow the theft of private property from individuals without legal recourse, as is allowed by our new Constitution – and as is taking place at the moment. To have legislated ouster clauses in our Constitution go directly against the rule of law and have no place in a modern Constitution!
Just to be sure that you are familiar with Section 72 of the Constitution I wish to quote parts of it:
“(2) Where agricultural land”, [agricultural land is where 70% of the people of Zimbabwe live] “or any right or interest in such land, is required for a public purpose… the land right or interest may be acquired by the State by notice published in the Gazette…whereupon the land, right or interest vests in the State with full title with effect from the date of the publication of the notice.
“(3) (a) no compensation is payable …
“(b) no person may apply to court for the determination of any question relating to compensation…and no court may entertain such application; and
“(c) the acquisition may not be challenged on the ground that it was discriminatory…
“(5) As soon as practical after agricultural land is acquired in accordance with subsection (2), the officer responsible for registration of title over land must, without further notice, effect the necessary endorsements upon any title deed and entries in any register for the purpose of formally cancelling the title deed and registering the States title over the land.
“(6) An act of parliament may make it an offence for any person, without lawful authority, to possess or occupy agricultural land referred to in this section or other State land.”
It is a simple equation: if the State can control all the land, it can control all the people. As it stands, under the Constitution, the State can throw anyone off the land it chooses. Ironically, even the most senior chefs with 99 year leases can fall foul of the Party and have their leases cancelled in 3 months.
Those with title can have it taken by the State at the stroke of a pen. Those that then continue to stay on what immediately becomes State land can be put in prison for up to 2 years. This leaves almost all of the more than a million farm workers still on the land “without lawful authority” liable to spend 2 years in jail for remaining in their houses under the “modern” Constitution if the State decides to use the law to control them. I really find it inconceivable that any democrat can be enthralled with a Constitution that says such things!
Will a Constitution that does not protect property rights bring investment? Of course not!
Will it create employment? Not at all!
Will it bring productivity to revive commerce and industry? No way!
Will it create tax money to revive education and health? An emphatic no!
Eddie, your courage, dedication and perseverance are unquestionable and I salute you for these things! It is extremely problematic however, when you make inaccurate and misleading claims about our Constitution when it explicitly fails to protect and promote the fundamental, basic and most far reaching right of individual private property rights for the people.
To pretend that our brave new Constitution “entrenches values and norms” is to walk to the edge of a cliff and carry on walking in the mistaken believe that gravity will somehow not take effect.
Yours sincerely
Ben Freeth
Spokesperson – SADC Tribunal Rights Watch
6 Replies to “Ben Freeth Blasts MDC-T”
Comments are closed.
But he has just given you an alternative, scrap the undemocratic sections and clauses!
The people of Zimbabwe approved the Copac constitution in the March 2013 referendum on the advice of MDC who insisted it was a democratic constitution and that it would delivery free and fair elections. It failed to deliver free and fair election, there can be no question about that.
You are not going to risk a hernia by wearing a shoe two sizes too small just because you paid for it! So why should we be stuck with a constitution that is not fit for purpose just because a corrupt and incompetent Tsvangirai told us to vote for it and we foolishly listened to the idiot!
True, a tyrant will always try to twist the law to suit him but in this case he does not need to do that because Zimbabwe’s new constitution is flawed already which is the point Ben is making. Eddie Cross is wittering about a good constitution which this rubbish is not!
Having failed to get even one democratic reform implemented, MDC were desperate to be seen as having done something and so the approved a weak and feeble constitution insisting it was an “MDC’s child”. Paul Mangwana the Zanu PF member on Copac boosted later that Mugabe “dictated” the new constitution.
We need to implement all the democratic reforms and the new constitution needs serious revision if not just scrap it all together and draft a new democratic constitution.
MDC leaders have shown that they are corrupt and breathtakingly incompetent. Zimbabwe had a real chance to end the Zanu PF dictatorship during the GNU sadly the chance was wasted.
What the people of Zimbabwe have to realise now is that MDC betrayed them and the sooner they accept that the sooner the nation can start the serious business of finding competent leaders to get us out of this hell-hole.
Leaders like Eddie Cross, Tsvangirai, Biti , Ncube, Coltart have been say all manner of nonsense just to win the people’s trust and vote. All MDC leaders are fighting for is a chance to get back on the gravy train.
Point of correction Mr Reporter Eddie Cross is a member of the new UMDC or MDC – Ncube. One thing I like about your paper is you are always the first to report events as they unfold in our country but your facts sometimes left us (readers) with more questions than answers.
whatever constitution you will have its the head of state who applies his mind to it, and chooses to ignore/twist certain sections to his advantage. in that regard its complete nonsense to continue to talk about a flawed constitution being the problem Zimbabwe is facing.
Ben Frith does not offer an alternative model to the one that was accepted by the people of Zimbabwe. I would love to hear if there is a better alternative. The challenge with the current scenario is that one cannot get land for free and hope to get permanent title. It the same vein, one cannot use land as collateral when they never paid for the land. That will be a classis case of ‘unjust enrichment’. So the only viable solution is to keep the ownership of agricultural land in the hands of the State. However, it will be necessary to allow individuals to challenge the State when it decides to repossess the land to avoid wanton abuse of authority for political purposes. As things stand, all the guys in Mujuru’s camp can lose their farms overnight. That cannot and should not be allowed to happen.